APHC010482152022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7240/2022 Between: Vanka Sri Valli and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND Boddani Sai Meghana and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. KANUKOLANU SRI SAI SANJAY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. MUTYALA SOBHANADRI NAIDU 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 2 I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7240 of 2022 COMMON ORDER: The instant petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short BNSS) has been filed by the petitioners/Accused Nos.4 and 5, seeking quashment of the proceedings against them in C.C.No.1108 of 2022 on the file of I Additional Junior Civil Judge-Cum-Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kakinada, for the offences under Sections 498-A IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. 2. The de facto complainant filed I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025, duly enclosing a Joint Memo entered between the petitioners as well as de facto complainant. It is stated that at the intervention of elders on both sides, the petitioners and the de facto complainant have arrived at an understanding and the matter has been settled between them. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel representing for the unofficial respondent No.1 (de facto-complainant) and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing respondent No.2/State are present. 4. Today, when the matter is taken up, petitioners herein/Accused Nos. 4 and 5 and 1st respondent herein are present before this Court. They produced their respective Aadhar cards in proof of their identity. Learned counsel for the 3 petitioners and the learned counsel for 1st respondent have identified the parties in the open Court. 5. This Court has questioned 1st respondent herein/de facto complainant with regard to compromise, and she categorically stated to that extent that she has voluntarily entered into compromise with the petitioners herein/Accused Nos. 4 and 5. This Court is satisfied with the identification of the parties and voluntariness in arriving at the compromise. 6. Since the parties entered into settlement and compromise, the Criminal Petition is allowed and therefore, the proceedings in C.C.No.1108 of 2022 on the file of I Additional Junior Civil Judge-Cum-Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kakinada against the petitioners herein/ Accused Nos. 4 and 5 is hereby quashed. 7. Accordingly, I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 and Criminal Petition No.7240 of 2022 are allowed. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 25.03.2025 PNS