SMT. SUGANDHA SHARMA UNIYAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
C482/312/2024 · 2025-05-09
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3261 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3261 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
C482 No.312 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Sagar Kothari, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant made a statement at bar that the matter has rendered infructuous for the reason that the dispute between the parties has been compromised and the matter has now been compounded before the learned trial court, wherefor C482 application has been filed.
4. The C482 application is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
09.05.2025 Ravi