Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3261 (RAJ)

KANTA KUNWAR D/O LAL SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/384/2021 · 2025-09-08

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35928] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 384/2021 1. Kanta Kunwar D/o Lal Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Leswa, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan. At Present Residing Ward No.2, Nand Nagar, Kekri, Ajmer. 2. Lokesh Singh Son of Ram Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ward No.2, Nand Nagar, Kekri, Ajmer. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. The Director General of Police, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The S.P. of Police, Ajmer, Rajasthan 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Kekri, Ajmer. 5. Smt. Indu Singh S/o Shree Virendra Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o S 13, Road No. 14, RIICO Complex, V.K.I. Road, Jaipur. 6. Shree Virendra Singh, Aged About 60 Years, R/o S 13, Road No. 14, RIICO Complex, V.K.I. Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahesh Gurjar, Adv. for Mr. Pradeep Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.GA Mr. Devi Singh, Dy.GA Mr. Mamraj Jat, Adv. for respondent Nos. 5 & 6 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 08/09/2025 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by the petitioners for seeking directions to non-petitioner Nos.1 to 4 to provide safety, security and ensure liberty of petitioners from the illegal acts of the non-petitioner Nos. 5 & 6, who have allegedly [2025:RJ-JP:35928] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-384/2021] threatened the petitioners to commit any untoward incident and cause danger to their life and liberty. 2. The present petition has been filed in the year 2021. 3. It is stated in the petition that petitioners are in live in relationship and for the last 4 years are living together. Protection was granted by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.02.2021 and respondent No.4-SHO, Police Station Kekri, District Ajmer was directed to ensure that no harm was caused to life and liberty of the petitioners from non-petitioner Nos.5 & 6 and other family members. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no untoward incident has been committed with the petitioners, so far. 5. In that view of the matter, the petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioners to file afresh, if need so arises. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /33