Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32606 (PNJ)

OM PARKASH SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/6631/2024 · 2025-04-07

Kuldeep Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (268) Om Parkash Singh and another State of Punjab and others CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. Court, that the prayer made in the instant petition has been infructuous. 2. been rendered infruc April 07, 2025 Manpreet IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Om Parkash Singh and another Versus Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate Mr. J.S. Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Teevar Sharma, AAG, Punjab for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Sanyam Malhotra, Advocate for respondent No.7. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, informs this Court, that the prayer made in the instant petition has been infructuous. Consequently, the instant writ red infructuous. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6631-2024 Date of Decision : 07.04.2025 …Petitioners Versus ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Advocate for Teevar Sharma, AAG, Punjab Mr. Sanyam Malhotra, Advocate Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, informs this Court, that the prayer made in the instant petition has been rendered writ petition is dismissed, as having (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, informs this rendered having MANPREET SINGH 2025.04.08 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment