1 2025:CGHC:33236 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3679 of 2025 1 - Pawan Kumar S/o Samar Singh Aged About 47 Years Caste Kanwar, R/o Village Tanakhar, Tehsil Podi Uproda, District Korba, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ram Kumar S/o Samar Singh Aged About 45 Years Caste Kanwar, R/o Village Tanakhar, Tehsil Podi Uproda, District Korba, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chandra Kumar S/o Samar Singh Aged About 51 Years Caste Kanwar, R/o Village Tanakhar, Tehsil Podi Uproda, District Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Korba District Korba Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh 4 - Tehsildar Katghora District Korba Chhattisgarh 5 - Taukeeir Ahmed S/o Salauddin Khan Aged About 39 Years Permanent R/o Village Risadi, Tehsil And District Korba, Chhattisgarh Presently R/o Village Tanakhar, Tehsil Podi Uproda, District Korba Chhattisgarh 6 - Mourdhwaj Puri S/o Late Suryabhan Puri Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Maheshpur, Tehsil Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh 7 - Anuj Puri S/o Late Suryabhan Puri Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Maheshpur, Tehsil Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh 2 8 - Santosh Puri S/o Late Suryabhan Puri Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Maheshpur, Tehsil Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh 9 - Ekta Bai D/o Late Suryabhan Puri Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Maheshpur, Tehsil Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Punit Ruparel & Mr. Rajiv Shrivas, Advocates For State : Mr. Satish Gupta, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 16/07/2025 Heard. 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the State contended that the alternate remedy available to the petitioners under Section 165(6) of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, therefore, this petition is not maintainable. 2. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to avail the alternative remedy as available to the petitioners under the Rule/law. 3. Prayer is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant