APHC010481542025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24530/2025 Between: 1. G.VIDYA SAGAR, S/O.G.DANIEL, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC PASTOR, R/O.D.NO. 18-299, NEAR RAMA KRISHNA SEVASAMHITI, BABU NAGAR, NUZVID, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. DANIEL,, S/O.PRAKASAM, AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, OCC.PASTOR, R/O.D.NO. 18-299, NEAR RAMA KRISHNA SEVASAMHITI, BABU NAGAR, NUZVID, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. G.NAGALAKSHMI,, W/O. G.VIDYA SAGAR, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC POSTAL EMPLOYEE, R/O.D.NO.17-21/42, JAKKARAIAH STREET, BESIDE RCM CHURCH, PEZZAMPET, VIJAYAWADA. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NTR DISTRICT, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA- 7 TOWN POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VIJAYAWADA- 7 TOWN POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 5. THE HEAD CONSTABLE, VIJAYAWADA- 7 TOWN POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 6. MOREMPUDILEELA KUTUMBRAO, S/O.CHANDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC JIO GENERAL MANAGER, R/O.SUNNAPUBATTILA CENTRE, VIJAYAWADA, HAVING OFFICE AT D NO .40-1- 146A,RELIANCETRENDS MALL, KBR HEIGHTS, BENZ CIRCLE, BESIDE VARUN BAJAJ SHOWROOM, MG ROAD, SAINAGAR RD, KALA NAGAR, ACHARYA RANGA NAGAR, LABBIPET, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 520010. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. B.ABHAY SIDDHANTH MOOTHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.3 to 5 in calling us to their Police Station with regard to civil disputes between us and the respondent No.6, at the instance of the respondents No.6 and asking us to settle the disputes with respondents No.6 by paying Rs. 1,70,00,000/- or else we would be put behind bar as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of power and quite contrary to the well established legal principles being laid down by the Hon'ble Court and the Hon'ble Apex Court from time to time apart from being violative of the Fundamental and Constitutional Rights guaranteed to us under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No.3 to 5 not to interfere with the civil disputes between us and the respondent Nos.6.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the complaint lodged by Respondent No.6, the Petitioners were called for preliminary enquiry. It is further submitted that the Police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioners and the unofficial Respondents. 3. Sri B.Abhay Siddhanth, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Police are interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioners and the unofficial Respondents. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioners and the unofficial Respondents. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:15.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.24530 of 2025 Dt.15.09.2025 Dinesh