Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32601 (RAJ)

SUBHASH CHANDRA SWAMI S/O RAGHUNATH PRASAD SWAMI v. SMT. VEENU GUPTA CHIEF SECRETARY

CCP/1145/2023 · 2025-09-19

Ganesh Ram Meena

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:38634] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1145/2023 1. Subhash Chandra Swami S/o Raghunath Prasad Swami, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Vpo-Bidasar, Via Bidasar District Sikar, Rajasthan. Presently Working On The Post Of Pti Grade-Ii. At Shahid Mangu Singh, Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Panlawa, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 2. Dharmendra Kumar Raigar S/o Kharati Lal, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Plot No. 58, Lohiya Farm, Via Bhadkeda, Jaipur Road Alwar, Rajasthan. Presently Working On The Post Of Pti Grade-Ii At Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Kalsada, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Smt. Veenu Gupta Chief Secretary, State Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Shri Pawan Kumar Goyal, Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur 3. Shri Gourav Agrawal, Director Of Secondary Education, Department Of Education, Bikaner. 4. Surendra Singh, Deputy Director, Department Of Secondary Education, District Kota. 5. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Ms. Pooja Sharma on behalf of Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG Mr. Lokesh Katara, Addl. D.O., Secondary Education Legal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 19/09/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:38634] (2 of 2) [CCP-1145/2023] 1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners. 2. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioners alleging non-compliance of the order dated 18.12.2022. 3. Vide order dated 18.12.2022, the Court issued direction to the respondents to decide the representations of the petitioners expeditiously in accordance with law. 4. Mr. Lokesh Katara, Addl. D.O., Secondary Education Legal, present in Court, states that the representations of the petitioners have been decided vide order dated 23.05.2024. 5. In view of the statement made by the Officer of the Education Department, the present contempt petition is disposed of and the contempt notices are discharged. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /161