Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32600 (AP)

B.Rajeswari v. The National Highway Authority of India

WP/29827/2022 · 2025-07-02

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

PHC010482622022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION No.29827/2022 Between: 1. B.RAJESWARI, W/O NARASIMHULU, D/O VENKATAIAH BOYUDU, AGED 54 YEARS, R/O NO.8, 1ST CROSS, MUNIVEERAPPA BLOCK, PALACE GUTALI, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, G 5AND6, SECTOR 10, DWARAKA, NEW DELHI. 2. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY CUM REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA (CHITTOOR), CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, S.R.PURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. NALLARI VENKATAIAH BOYUDU VENKATAIAH, S/O LATE N.GURAVAIAH, AGED 77 YEARS, 6. N KUPPAIAH BOYUDU, S/O N.VENKATAIAH BOYUDU, AGED 58 YEARS, 7. N SURENDRA, S/O N.KUPPAIAH BOYUDU, AGED 32 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.5-7 ARE RESIDING AT- AMBARA MAHARAJAPURAM VILLAGE, S.R.PURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to direct the respondents no.1 to 4 to not to disburse the compensation for land in Sy.No.13/1A to an extent of Ac.1.7625 cents, Sy.No.16/2B to an extent of Ac.0.24 cents, Sy.No.16/19 to an extent of Ac.0.17 cents, Sy.No.13/8 to an extent of Ac.0.09 cents, Sy.No.13/6 to an extent of Ac.0.02 cents, Sy.No.13/4 to an extent of Ac.0.25 cents, Sy.No.13/12 to an extent of Ac.0.18 cents, Sy.No.13/2 to an extent of Ac.1.94 cents and Sy.No.13/2B to an extent of Ac.1.27 cents in Kannikapuram village, S.R.Puram Mandal, Chittoor District, in favour of the respondents no.5 to 7 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct respondents no.1 to 4 to consider and act upon the legal notices dated 29.05.2022 and 12.08.2022 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents no.1 to 4 to not to disburse the compensation for land in Sy.No.13/1A to an extent of Ac.1.7625 cents, Sy.No.16/2B to an extent of Ac.0.24 cents, Sy.No.16/19 to an -extent of Ac.0.17 cents, Sy.No.13/8 to an extent of Ac.0.09 cents, Sy.N-).1.3/6 to an extent of Ac.0.02 cents, Sy.No.13/4 to an extent of Ac.O. 5 cents, Sy.No.13/12 to an extent of Ac.0.18 cents, Sy.No.13/2 to an extent of Ac.1.94 cents and Sy.No.13/2B to an extent of Ac.1.27 cents in Kannikapuram village, S.R.Puram Mandal, Chittoor District, in favour of the respondents no.5 to 7pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MEKA RAHUL CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. 3. T JANARDHAN RAO The Court made the following: ORDER:- 1. It is represented by the counsel for the petitioner that, the present writ petition is settled before the Lok Adalat and accordingly he filed a Memo dated 23.06.2025 vide USR No.59232. 2. The said memo is placed on record. 3. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR 03.07.2025 DR 50 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR WP No.29827 of 2022 Date 03.07.2024 DR