Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3260 (UTT)

PRATAP SINGH v. MANAGING DIRECTOR UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/259/2025 · 2025-03-04

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 259 of 2025 (S/S) Sri Pratap Singh ….......Petitioner Vs. Managing Director, Uttarakhand Transport Corporation, Dehradun and others …..... Respondents Present : Mr. Gulshan Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, Advocate for the respondents. JUDGMENT Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) By means of the instant petition, the petitioners seek the following reliefs:- “i- a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to call for the record of case and quash impugned pay fixation order dated 28-8-2021, and the recovery order dated 27-9-2024 contain in Annexure no.3 & 4 to this writ petition. ii- a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to release the Gratuity amount of the petitioner on the basis of last drawn salary of the petitioner. ii- a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to refund the entire amount i.e. Rs.183015/- deducted/recovered from the Retiral dues / Gratuity of the petitioner. iii- a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, which this Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper on the basis of the facts and circumstances of the case. iv- Award the cost of the petition to the petitioner.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment dated 04.04.2024, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No.245 of 2022, Managing Director, Uttarakhand Transport Corporation, Dehradun and others vs. Ashok Kumar Saxena; and connected cases. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents admits this fact. 5. Since, the matter is covered, instant petition is decided in terms of the judgment dated 04.04.2024, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No.245 of 2022, Managing Director, Uttarakhand Transport Corporation, Dehradun and others vs. Ashok Kumar Saxena; and connected cases. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 04.03.2025 Sanjay