Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32597 (JHR)

LALAN KUMAR GOSWAMI v. THE EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, SAKTORIYA

C.M.P./480/2024 · 2025-12-05

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:36489 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.480 of 2024 ----- 1. Lalan Kumar Goswami, aged about 42 years, Son of Late Badrinath Goswami, 2. Rajeev Goswami, aged about 41 years, Son of Late Badrinath Goswami, 3. Bholanath Goswami, aged about 39 years, Son of Late Badrinath Goswami, 4. Jatesh Goswami, aged about 62 years, Son of Late Loknath Goswami, All are Resident of Village-Lohandiya Bazar, P.O.-Lohandiya Bazar, P.S.-Lalmatia, District-Godda (Jharkhand); at present Residents of Lalmatia, P.O. and P.S.-Lalmatia, District- Godda (Jharkhand). … Petitioner(s). Versus 1. The Eastern Coalfields Limited, Saktoriya, P.O. and P.S.-Disargarh, District-Burdhaman (West Bengal). 2. The General Manager (I.E.), Eastern Coalfields Limited, Saktoriya, P.O. and P.S.-Disargarh, District-Burdhaman (West Bengal). 3. The General Manager (In-charge), Eastern Coalfields Limited, Dhankunda, P.O. and P.S.-Bara Simra, District-Godda (Jharkhand). 4. The Area Manager (Yo. Ni. Bi, and Parya), Eastern Coalfields Limited, Rajmahal Area, P.O. and P.S.-Lalmatia, District-Godda (Jharkhand). 5. The Deputy Commissioner, Godda, P.O. and P.S.-Godda, District- Godda (Jharkhand). 6. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Godda, P.O. and P.S.-Godda, District-Godda (Jharkhand). 7. The Sub-divisional Officer, Mahagama, P.O. and P.S.-Mahagama, District-Godda (Jharkhand). 8. The Circle Officer, Boarijor, P.O. and P.S.-Boarijor, District-Godda (Jharkhand). 9. The State of Jharkhand. … Opposite Party(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kanti Kr. Ojha, Advocate For State of Jharkhand : Mr. Rahul Saboo, GP-II Mr. Kunal Chandra Suman, AC to GP-II …...... 06 /05.12.2025: This is an application for restoration of W.P.(C) No. 1870 of 2022 to its original file, which was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that he will remove the defect(s) within three weeks and begs apology for inconvenience caused to the Hon’ble Court. 2025:JHHC:36489 2 3. Considering his submission, this CMP is allowed. Consequently, W.P.(C) No. 1870 of 2022 is restored to its original file subject to condition that the defect(s) pointed out by the Registry must be removed within a period of three weeks, failing which, this order of restoration will not be given effect to. 4. After restoration, W.P.(C) No. 1870 of 2022 be listed before an appropriate Bench. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 05.12.2025 Tanuj/ Uploaded on 06.12.2025