IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 691 CWP-3797-2004 (O&M) Date of decision: 04.04.2025 Ranbir Singh Dhillon ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : None for the petitioner Mr. Arun Gupta, DAG Punjab Mr. B.S. Naher, Advocate for respondent No.4 ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the impugned letters as also directing the respondents to treat the petitioner still in service and released due promotion, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving. 2. Learned State counsel refers to para 46 (viii) of the written statement dated 16.05.2005 filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3, wherein it has been stated that the petitioner as a matter of fact was retired on his own request submitted on 12.09.1999, Annexure R-1 and accordingly, all benefits, to which he was entitled, were released, there being no rebuttal to the same by filing any replicaton. 3. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, in case lis still subsists. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 04.04.2025 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2025.04.05 10:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document