- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2227 RFA No. 1391 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1391 OF 2017 (MON) BETWEEN: 1. MR. SRIDHAR VENKATARAMAN SON OF SRI VENKATARAMAN, DIRECTOR, WRONGLY REFERRED AS:- M/S PRECISION TECHONOPLAST, NO.48, GOWDANAPALYA, BEHIND RAPSRI ENGINEERING, SUBRAMANYAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 061. ACTUALLY M/S PRECISION INDUSTRIAL COMPONENTS, UNIT 1, 14, M.M.INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, YEDIYUR, BANGALORE-560 092. 2. MRS REVATHI VENKATARAMAN WIFE OF SRI VENKATARAMAN, DIRECTOR, DIRECTOR, WRONGLY REFERRED AS:- M/S PRECISION TECHONOPLAST, NO.48, GOWDANAPALYA, BEHIND RAPSRI ENGINEERING, SUBRAMANYAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 061. ACTUALLY M/S PRECISION INDUSTRIAL COMPONENTS, UNIT 1, 14, M.M.INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, YEDIYUR, BANGALORE-560 092. …APPELLANTS (BY SMT.SUNITHA.H.SINGH., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2227 RFA No. 1391 of 2017 AND: 1. M/S PREMIER TOOLINGS 46, INDUSTRIAL LAYOUT, BSK II STAGE, BANGALORE-560 070. REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR. MR RAVISHANKAR. 2. M/S PRECISION TECHONOPLAST NO.48, GOWDANAPALYA, BEHIND RAPSRI ENGINEERING, SUBRAMANYAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 061, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, BY SRIDHAR VENKATARAM, (WRONGLY STATED). …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A.RAVISHANKAR., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1; NOTICE TO R2-HELD SUFFICIENT V/O DATED:30.06.2023) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, the appellants are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 13.01.2025, on that day, there was no - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2227 RFA No. 1391 of 2017 representation on behalf of the appellants. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the appellants, the appeal was ordered to be listed on 20.01.2025. The appeal is listed today. As already noted above, though matter called twice, the appellants are not represented. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 82