1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7170 of 2025 1 - Arun Kumar Tamrakar S/o Shri Madan Mohan Tamrakar Aged About 38 Years Working On The Post Of Ophthalmic Assistant Community Health Centre, P.H.C. Bhanji Manendragarh, District - Manendragarh-Chirmiri- Bharatpur C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Health And Family Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, P.O. And P.S. Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Deputy Secretary, Public Health And Family Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, P.O. And P.S. Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 3 - Commissioner-Cum-Director Health Services Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Atal Nagar, P.O. And P.S. Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 4 - The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Manendragarh, District M C B (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. V.K. Pandey, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Ajit Singh, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 16/07/2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition claiming for the following reliefs:- VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.07.17 10:56:36 +0530 2 “The petitioner respectfully begs to pray before this Honourable Court, that, the Honourable Court may kindly be pleased to:- 10.1 issue notices to the respondents, returnable within early date of hearing. 10.2 set-aside/quash impugned transfer order dated 26.06.2025 Annexure P-1 passed by respondent no. 2 in respect of the petitioner. 10.3 issue any other relief(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) in favour of petitioner, which deemed fit & proper in the facts & circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice. 10.4 Cost of the petition.” 2. After arguing for sometimes, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, there is a provision under clause 8 of the transfer policy dated 05-06-2025 for making a representation before the transfer committee. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to move his representation before the said transfer committee and the said transfer committee may be directed to decide the representation, so filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law within the stipulated time frame. 3. The submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the State counsel and would submit that he has no objection, if such a direction is to be given to the transfer committee to decide the 3 representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within the stipulated time frame. 4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to make his representation before the transfer committee, as provided under clause 8 of the said transfer policy dated 05-06-2025, and if such representation is made to the said committee, the same shall be decided in accordance with law on its own merits within a further period of one month from the date of receipt of the representation along with the copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid observation, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved