APHC010482102025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24488/2025 Between: 1. B VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. SOMEAWAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4-224-6, BEHIND POLICE STATION, YARRAGUNTIA MANDAL AND TOWN, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT,ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY( HOME), STATE SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANAGALGIRI,ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, YARRAGUNTIA POLICE STATION, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT, A.P. 5. ADABALA SURESH KUMAR, S/O. ADABALA SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN. 6. ADABALA LAKSHMI, W/O. SURESH KUMAR, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN. (THE RESPONDENTS NO.5 AND 6 ARE R/O. KARANGARI STREET,U. KOTHAPAALI MANDAL KAKINADA DISTRICT CURRENTLY RESIDING AT RURAL SARPAVARAM JUDICIAL, RAYUDUPALEM, KAKINADA CITY, KAKINADA DISTRICT.) ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THANJAVURU VENKATA SUMAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 no. 3 and 4 in not taking cognizance and register my complaint/report lodged and the representation dated 16.08.2025 and 01.09.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents no. 3 and 4 to take cognizance of the complaint/report lodged by me and consider the representation dated 16.08.2025 and 01.09.2025 made by the petitioner to register an F.I.R. against the respondents no. 5 and 6 and further investigate into the matter in the interest of justice.” ” 2. Heard Sri T.V.Suman, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the police, upon verification of the petitioner's representation, are ready to register a case. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to complete the enquiry and take appropriate steps in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:18.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.24488 of 2025 Dt.18.09.2025 Asr