02.08.2025 DL.14 Court No.6 sg C.O. 2554 of 2025 Multi Commodity Exchange of India (MCX) Vs. Subhendu Pattanayak & Ors. Mr. Meghajit Mukherjee Ms. Mobina Ali Ms. Srijeeta Gupta Ms. Sonia Gupta Ms. Khushi Khaitan ….for the petitioner. Mr. Aniruddha Sen Mr. Debesh Das Mr. Amit Das ….for the opposite parties. Leave is granted to the learned advocate-on- record for the opposite party no.1 to file vokalatnama in the department in course of the day. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the opposite party no.6 before the learned District Consumer Redressal Commission, Kolkata -1, North in Execution Application No. DC/315/EA 28/2023 in DC/315/CC/45/2017 and is directed against an order no. 15 dated June 2, 2025. After some argument, the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed an application challenging the maintainability of the execution application through online mode but the maintainability application has not been taken up for hearing. He submits that on enquiry, the 2 petitioner has come to know that there are some defects but the defects have not been indicated to the petitioner and as a result of which, the petitioner could not cure the said defects. It will be open to the petitioner to take appropriate steps before the District Consumer Redressal Commission, Kolkata – I, North in this regard. With the aforesaid observation, civil revisional application CO 2554 of 2025 stands disposed of without interfering with the order impugned. . ( Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J. )