GOLDEE KHURANA AND OTHERS v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH SHO POLICE STATION WOMEN CELL JAMMU AND ANOTHER
CRM(M)/417/2022 · 2025-05-19
Rajesh Sekhri
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3259 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3259 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CrlM No. 900/2025 in CRM(M) No. 417/2022
Goldee Khurana and Ors.
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Mohd. Arshad Chowdhary, Advocate vice Ms. Deepika Pushkar Nath, Advocate.
q
vs
U T of J&K and Anr.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. S.S. Ahmed, Advocate for R-2.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 30.05.2025
CrlM No.900/2025
The applicants/petitioners preferred a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashment of FIR No.05/2020. This Court vide order dated 19.05.2025 quashed the said FIR as it came to be closed by Investigating Agency as not admitted. However, a perusal of the impugned FIR annexed with the petition reveals that it is FIR No.0005/2022, however, number was wrongly mentioned by petitioners in the petition.
In view of the above, since the said FIR has been closed as not proved by the Investigating Agency and an error had inadvertently crept in the petition, therefore, present application is allowed and order dated 19.05.2025 is modified by providing that FIR No.0005/2022 be read in place of FIR No.05/2020.
This order shall form part of order dated 19.05.2025.
CrlM No.900/2025 is accordingly disposed of.
(Rajesh Sekhri)
Judge
Jammu 30.05.2025 Eva
Sr. No. 138