1 2025:CGHC:33679 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7016 of 2025 1 - Smt. Satyabhama Sahu W/o Shri Nekram Sahu Aged About 54 Years Presently Working As Asst. Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Siyadehi, Block - Nagri, District - Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Education Division Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Collector District - Dhamtari (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Dhamtari, District - Dhamtari (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer Nagri, District - Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Respondents 2025:CGHC:33638 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 WPS No. 7639 of 2025 1 - Smt. Shashi Kiran Uranw W/o. Shri Raj Kumar Uranw, Aged About 33 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School, Chiknipali, Block Kartala, District Korba (C.G.). ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 3 - Joint Director, Education Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Collector, District Korba (C.G.). 5 - District Education Officer, Korba, District Korba (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer, Kartala, District Korba (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Mr. S.P. Kale, Addl. Advocate General and Ms. Smita Jha, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 17-07-2025 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation the writ petitions filed by the petitioners against their transfer order(s) after declaring surplus Teacher under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions, were disposed of on 13-06-2025 and 12-06-2025 respectively with liberty to move fresh representation, if already not made, and in turn the District Rationalization Committee was directed to decide the same within specific time period. Now these petitions have been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioners. 3 2. The counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07-07-2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioners. Therefore, the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw these petitions with liberty to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07- 07-2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07-07- 2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, both these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the petitioners to move/pursue their representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07-07- 2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil