Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32587 (KAR)

SRI D SHUBAKAR NAYAK v. SRI S VENKATESHWARARAJU

RFA/1884/2022 · 2025-01-15

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1491 RFA No. 1884 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1884 OF 2022 (INJ) BETWEEN: SRI.D.SHUBAKAR NAYAK S/O SHIVANNA NAYAK, AGED 55 YEARS, FLAT NO.5, BLOCK NO.50, CIRCULAR ROAD, NANDINI LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 096. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ABHISHEK MARLA.M.J., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. S.VENKATESHWARARAJU AGED 62 YEARS, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN, NO. 687/7, III BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 010. …RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 06.01.2025, on that day, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1491 RFA No. 1884 of 2022 the office was directed to list the appeal under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’ on 15.01.2025. The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the appellant has not complied with the office objections. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. In view of peremptory order dated 06.01.2025, the appeal is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5