[2025:RJ-JP:2473] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13759/2024 Dheeraj S/o Shri Pyarelal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Chainpura Bariya, Police Station Kudgaon, District Karauli (Raj.). (The Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 17/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.177/2024 registered at Police Station Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawai Madhopur for the offence punishable under Section 309(6) of BNS. During investigation, offences under Sections 309(6) & 310(2) of BNS have been found proved against the petitioner. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that FIR was lodged on petty dispute arose between the parties. Now, dispute has been resolved amicably by the parties which is evident from para No.5 of impugned order. Learned counsel contends that petitioner is in custody since [2025:RJ-JP:2473] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13759/2024] 12.10.2024 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. Charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably; charge-sheet has been filed; petitioner is in custody since 12.10.2024 and trial will take time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Dheeraj S/o Shri Pyarelal, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioner is directed to mark his presence in the concerned police station once in every three months, till trial is concluded. [2025:RJ-JP:2473] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13759/2024] 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If breach of this condition is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to the petitioner by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /108