- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20095 RFA No. 655 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 655 OF 2016 (PAR) BETWEEN: SRI.H.UMASHANKAR S/O SRI.HULLURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT NO.14, VISHVANATHANAGENAHALLI, R.T.NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. RAHAMANTHULLA SHARIFF., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: SRI. MUNIVENKATAPPA (DEAD). S/O LATE DODDAHALLURAPPA, 1. SRI.M.HULLURAPPA S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 2. SMT. SHASHIKALA D/O HULLURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 3. SRI.GOPALAKRISHNA S/O HULLURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 4. MANJULA D/O HULLURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, 5. SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI @ SHOBHA D/O HULLURAPPA, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20095 RFA No. 655 of 2016 AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT: VISHWANATHANAGENAHALLI VILLAGE, R.T.NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032. 6. SRI.BIDDAPPA S/O BACHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, R/AT KANTHAPPA STREET, SARAJAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT. 7. SMT. GOWRAMMA (DEAD), SINCE DEAD BY LR'S, KRISHNAPPA, S/O BIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, 8. SMT. JAYAMMA D/O BIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 7 & 8 ARE R/AT: NO.30, 2ND CROSS, AYYAPPA GARDEN, ADUGODI, BANGALORE-560 030. 9. SRI. SAJJAN KUMAR GARGA S/O LOKERAMA GARGE, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO.572, II BLOCK, III MAIN ROAD, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAGHUNATH., ADVOCATE FOR R7; SRI. J.M.RAJANNA SETTY., ADVOCATE FOR R8; R1, 2, 4, 5 & 9 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20095 RFA No. 655 of 2016 THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 05.06.2025. On that day, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the appellant, the appeal was ordered to be listed on 12.06.2025. The appeal is listed today for appearance of counsel for the appellant. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20095 RFA No. 655 of 2016 In view of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42