Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32584 (BOM)

BENIRAM SADASHIV SHIMPI v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISION OFFICER, MINOR IRRIGATION, JALGAON AND ORS

CA/381/2025 · 2025-04-15

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 159-ca-381-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 381 OF 2025 IN FAST/32395/2024 Beniram Sadashiv Shimpi VERSUS The Special Land Acquision Officer, Minor Irrigation, Jalgaon And Ors ... Adv. Mrunal Andhare h/f Adv. A. B. Kale, Advocate for Applicant Adv. V. S. Badakh, AGP for Respondents-State Adv. S. S. Chillarge, Advocate for Respondent No.2 ….. CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. Dated : 15TH APRIL, 2025 PER COURT :- 1. Heard learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties. 2. Applicants seeks to condone the delay of 2225 days caused in filing appeal against the award passed by the Reference Court. 3. Perused the application and reasons stated therein. Applicant is agriculturist and lost his land due to compulsory acquisition. He filed reference under Section 18, which came to be dismissed. The applicant could not approach this Court 2025:BHC-AUG:11348 2 159-ca-381-2025 within time due to financial duress. The contents of application are not disputed. Looking to the nature of the dispute and reasons stated in the application, case is made out to condone the delay, subject to certain condition. Hence, following order: ORDER i. Civil Application is allowed. ii. Delay of 2225 days caused in filing appeal is condoned, subject to condition that applicant files an undertaking to Registrar (Judicial) of this Court within a period of eight weeks from today stating that he shall not claim interest and statutory benefit for the period of delay. iii. Civil Application is disposed of. ( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ) Rushikesh/2025