Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32583 (RAJ)

KISHAN SHARMA S/O SHRI RAMJI LAL SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13779/2024 · 2025-01-23

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:3333] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13779/2024 Kishan Sharma S/o Shri Ramji Lal Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Plot No. C-53, Vishnu Vihar Colony, Jagatpura, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajnees Gupta through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP through VC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR Order 23/01/2025 1. Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with FIR No.28/2023 registered at Police Station State Galtagate, Jaipur city (North) for offence under Section 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and FIR named accused Naresh Joshi has been allowed anticipatory bail for the reason that allegation against Naresh Joshi was only to the extent of receiving of brokerage of the land deal. Other allegations of cheating were against the named accused persons in the FIR. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for bail. 5. Considering the facts aforesaid, prayer for bail is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within two weeks, the petitioner above-named shall be released on [2025:RJ-JP:3333] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13779/2024] anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties of like amount on following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case. (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the trial court. (iv) One of the sureties shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the trial court. 6. Accordingly, this criminal misc. bail application stands allowed. (BIRENDRA KUMAR),J 27-Nitin/Jaipur/-