Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32582 (AP)

Kurnool Districtr Rural Development Society, v. Council for Advancement of People's Action and Rural

WP/38620/2012 · 2025-08-11

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010482462012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 38620/2012 Between: 1. KURNOOL DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY, SKD COLONY, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS PRESIDENT V.TIRUPALU. 1. COUNCIL FOR ADVANCEMENT OF PEOPLES ACTION AND RURAL, TECHNOLOGY (CAPART) (UNDER THE AEGIS OF MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA), INDIA HABITAT CENTRE, ZONE-5A, (CORE DELHI 110003, REP.BY ITS DIRECTOR GENERAL. 2. THE CHIEF VIGILANCE OFFICER, COUNCIL FOR ADVANCEMENT OF PEOPLE'S ACTION AND RURAL TECHNOLOGY, (UNDER THE AEGIS OF MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA) INDIA HABITAT CENTRE, ZONE FLOOR, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN POLICE STATION, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities 1 and 2 in pressurizing the petition IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 38620/2012 KURNOOL DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY, SKD COLONY, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS PRESIDENT V.TIRUPALU. ...PETITIONER AND COUNCIL FOR ADVANCEMENT OF PEOPLES ACTION AND RURAL, TECHNOLOGY (CAPART) (UNDER THE AEGIS OF MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA), INDIA HABITAT 5A, (CORE-C), 2"D FLOOR, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI 110003, REP.BY ITS DIRECTOR GENERAL. THE CHIEF VIGILANCE OFFICER, COUNCIL FOR ADVANCEMENT OF PEOPLE'S ACTION AND RURAL TECHNOLOGY, (UNDER THE AEGIS OF MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA) INDIA HABITAT CENTRE, ZONE-5A, (CORE FLOOR, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI. E SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN POLICE STATION, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities 1 and 2 in pressurizing the petitioner for production of File No. 701 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3459] THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM KURNOOL DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY, SKD COLONY, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT, REP.BY ...PETITIONER COUNCIL FOR ADVANCEMENT OF PEOPLES ACTION AND RURAL, TECHNOLOGY (CAPART) (UNDER THE AEGIS OF MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA), INDIA HABITAT C), 2"D FLOOR, LODHI ROAD, NEW THE CHIEF VIGILANCE OFFICER, COUNCIL FOR ADVANCEMENT OF PEOPLE'S ACTION AND RURAL TECHNOLOGY, (UNDER THE AEGIS OF MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT 5A, (CORE-C), 2ND E SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN POLICE STATION, ADONI, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent er for production of File No. 701- 2 29/91-Drinking Water Supply dated 16.3.1992, pertaining to its office, after 18 years of completion of the project, by threatening that an FIR would be lodged through the 4th respondent against the petitioners for not cooperating in reconstituting the above file as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to drop the further proceedings against the petitioners pertaining to File No.701-29/91-Drinking Water Supply dated 16.3.1992, dated 16.3.1992 of the 1st respondent office according to the decision taken it in its 56th meeting dated 20.1.2012 treating it as work "completed" and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 48975 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the respondents not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner, with regard to the File No.701-29/91-Drinking Water Supply dated 16.3.1992 of the 1st respondent's office, pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 4 OF 2012(WPMP 209356 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MANJUNATH ALLUR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 3. RAMA RAO GANTANNAGARI The Court made the following ORDER: Sri Ugranarasimha, the learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. 3 As a sequel, miscellaneous pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 12.08.2025 GRL 4 196 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 38620 of 2012 Date: 12.08.2025 GRL