1 2025:CGHC:24549 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 911 of 2022 Chaitendra Singh S/o Shaubhit Singh Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Patora Tongri Para, Lundra, District Ambikapur (C.G.) --- Applicant versus 1. Ghasi Ram S/o Late Amrit Yadav Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Dakai, P.S. Lundra, District Surguja (C.G.) 2. Suresh Pavle S/o Sitaram Pavle Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Dakai, P.S. Lundra, District Surguja (C.G.) 3. Manoj Kumar Yadav S/o Late Vilas Yadav Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Dakai, P.S. Lundra, District Surguja (C.G.) 4. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Lundra, District Surguja (C.G.) --- Respondent(s) For Applicant : Mr. Anshul Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 16.06.2025 1. The present revision petition has been filed by the applicant with the following prayer:- PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2025.06.18 16:00:07 +0530 2 “It is therefore, most humbly prayed that the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant revision petition and order dated 02.07.2022, passed by 3rd Upper Session Judge, Ambikapur, District – Surguja, passed in Criminal Case/238/2021, passed in the matter of “State of Chhattisgarh v/s. Ghasi Ram Yadav & Others”, so far as it relates to rejection of the application of framing of the charge under Section 3(2)(III)(VI) of Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 is concerned, may kindly be set-aside, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he wants to withdraw this petition, stating that the trial is in advance stage. 3. There appears to be no interim order passed in the present revision. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed on this ground alone. 5. The trial Court is at liberty to proceed with the trial and to conclude the same expeditiously, if the same has already not been concluded. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. 7. Registrar (Judicial) is directed to communicate this order to the concerned trial Court for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Preeti