1 2025:CGHC:33257-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3074 of 2024 1 - Prashant Sharma S/o Shri Ram Krishna Sharma Aged About 43 Years R/o Professor Colony Sector 2 Vinayak Vihar Thana Puarani Basti Raipur, District- Raipur, C.G. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station- Purani Basti Raipur, Distt. - Raipur, C.G. 2 - Madhu Manikpuri D/o Madandas Manikpuri Aged About 35 Years R/o Vinayak Vihar, Professor Colony Purani Basti Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. --- Respondent(s) CRMP No. 2225 of 2024 1 - Madhu Manikpuri D/o Madan Das Manikpuri Aged About 35 Years R/o Vinayak Vihar, Sector-2, Professor Colony Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.07.17 11:21:22 +0530 2 ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, P.S.- Purani Basti District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Rakhi Sharma W/o Shri Prashant Sharma Aged About 42 Years R/o Vinayak Vihar, Near Mahamaya Electrical, Sector-2, Professor Colony, Purani Basti, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner in Cr.M.P. No. 3074/2024 :Shri Rohit Sharma, Advocate For Petitioner in Cr.M.P. No. 2225/2024 :Shri Vikas Kumar Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent/State :Shri Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate. For Respondent No. 2 in Cr.M.P. No. 3074/2024 :Shri Vikas Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondent No. 2 in Cr.M.P. No. 2225/2024 :Shri Rohit Sharma, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 16.07.2025 1. Since both the petitions arising out of same incident and the petitioners herein filed counter reports against each other therefore, they are considered and being decided by this common order. 3 2. In Cr.M.P No. 3074/2024, the petitioner would pray for following relief:- “It is therefore, prayed that the petition may kindly be allowed and Quash and set aside the First Information Report (FIR) bearing no 295/2023 registered in Purani Basti, Raipur (C.G) and quash and set aside the Impugned charge sheet arising there from against the petitioner, under Section 429 of the Indian Penal Code, as the allegations do not prima facie disclose any offence under this section, in the interest of justice.” 3. In Cr.M.P No. 2225/2024, the petitioner would pray for following relief:--- A. It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and pleased to quash the registration of F.I.R. No. 365/2023, filed against the present petitioners, in the interest of justice. B. Any other relief/order may also be granted that may be deemed fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case. 4. The Case of the parties is that the stray dogs introduced by the complainant (petitioner in Cr.M.P. No. 2225/2024) in the locality attacked the son of the petitioner in Cr.M.P. No. 3074/2024 for which a dispute occurred between the parties and they lodged the reports against each other. In Cr.MP No. 2225/2024 the complainant/petitioner alleging that the petitioner in Cr.M.P. No. 3074/2024 and his family members threatened her with dire consequences. 4 5. From bare perusal of the pleadings and the documents appended in both the petitions it is manifest that the parties have lodged the reports against the each other regarding the attack of the stray dogs. 6. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due investigation the charge sheet was filed before the competent court. He would submit that the proceedings initiated by the police authorities is just and proper and there is no illegalilty at all. 7. Having considered the entire facts and circumstances of the case and particularly considering the fact that there are counter reports against each other in respect of attack of stray dogs, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, both the petitions are allowed and the FIR No. 295/2023 in (Cr.M.P. No. 3074/2024) registered in Purani Basti, Raipur (C.G.) as well as the FIR No. 365/2023 in (Cr.M.P. No. 2225/2024) and all consequential proceedings arising out of above-mentioned FIRs in both the petitions are hereby quashed. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Amardeep/Shoaib