RAJENDRA PRASAD SHAKYA v. STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/3603/2025 · 2025-03-23
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32574 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32574 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:42889 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3603 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad Shakya Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharad Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Awadhesh Kumar Saxena,C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. Heard Sharad Kumar Singh, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Awadhesh Kumar Saxena, learned counsel for respondent. The petitioner on basis of document annexed along with this writ petition has not able to show that petitioner was vigilant towards his right and approached the concerned respondent within a short period, however, still considering that Appellate Authority has passed an order dated 20.10.2015, whereby his order of termination was not interfered but it was held that his legal dues cannot be stopped, therefore, a legal consequence of aforesaid
order will follow. The details of due amount is not on record. Still considering that petitioner is now above the age of 70 years, therefore, this writ petition is disposed of that a case of petitioner be considered in a sympathetic manner and legal consequence of referred order dated 20.10.2015, i.e. if petitioner is entitled for any dues, the same may be clear within a reasonable period and for that concerned respondent may look into the matter.
Order Date :- 24.3.2025 P. Pandey Digitally signed by :- PUSHPENDRA PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad