1 2025:CGHC:3595-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 32 of 2025 1 - Randeep Singh S/o Late Surjeet Singh Aged About 46 Years R/o C-402, Nilaya Apartments, V.I.P. Road, Raipur, Tahsil And District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, District Surguja (C.G.) 2 - The Board Of Revenue Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur 3 - The Tahsildar Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 4 - The Naib Tahsildar Ambikapur-2, District- Surguja (C.G.) 5 - Police Station Ambikapur Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B. P. Sharma, Advocate along with Mr. M.L. Sakat, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Dy. G.A. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 21.01.2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following reliefs:- 2 “A writ and/or an order in the nature of mandamus do issue calling for records pertaining to case of petitioner from respondent concerned including the record of revenue authorities, as detailed in writ petition, for perusal of this Hon’ble Court, if deem fit. b. A writ and/or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue constituting a Special Investigating Team in the matter for an inquiry in this regard in respect of the averments made by the petitioner in habendum of writ petition and also for the investigation in respect of involvement of petitioner in the alleged crime in question regarding which FIR, Annexure-P/1, has been registered, in order to protect the petitioner’s fundamental right guaranteed under Article 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India as the petitioner’s case is of total innocence and impersonation by some other person of the petitioner and till the team is constituted in this regard and reaches to the conclusion of the involvement of the petitioner, protect the personal liberty of the petitioner by passing appropriate order on such terms as this Hon’ble Court in the peculiar factual matrix of the case and in the interest of justice. c. A writ and/or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue quashing the FIR (Annexure-P/1) registered against the petitioner by respondent Police in the peculiar factual matrix of the case. d. A writ and/or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue directing for Court monitored investigation in the matter as not only this is the case of abuse of process of law and abuse of process of Court, not only of revenue courts right from tip to the toe and also of this Hon’ble Court of obtaining an order from this Hon’ble Court at the behest of the petitioner without there being any authorization in this regard and in the facts and circumstances of the case. e. Cost of the prceedings. f. Any other writs and directions that may be deemed fit 3 and just in the facts and circumstances of case.” 2. At the time of hearing, this Court has observed that the prayer which has been made in the present petition is defective one as there is no mention of the date on which the FIR has been registered nor the offences or the Police Station or the District has been mentioned. 3. In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with the liberty to file a duly constituted petition. 4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty with a cost of Rs. 2000/- to be deposited in the account of Girls Observation Home, Dist- Surguja (CG) within 7 days from today and furnish the receipt of the same before the registry of this Court. 5. Registry is directed to return back the certified copy of documents after retaining attested true copy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Sagrika