APHC010481712007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 20904/2007 Between: 1. SRI.K.APPA RAO, VIJAYAWADA., S/O.LATE KONDAIAH BUSINESS 11-58-22, CANAL ROAD VIJAYAWADA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. CHAIRMAN C B D T N DELHI 3 OTHERS, CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 110 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, QUEEN'S ROAD, BANGALORE-1. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, 4-5-19/9B, FIRST FLOOR, OPPOSITE TO SIDDARTHA ARTS COLLEGE, SIDDARTHA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA. 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VIJAYAWADA, 1ST FLOOR, ANNEX BUILDING, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, M.G.ROAD, VIJAYAWADA - 521 002. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, direction or order especially in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned order No. Tech./273A/VJA/06-07 dated 12.3.2007 passed by Respondent No.4, and direct Respondent No.3 to pass an order waiving the penalties and interest imposed on the petitioner for the assessment years 1982-83 to 1984-85 and pass such other order(s). IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 27110 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order directing Respondent No.3 not to initiate, take or continue any coercive steps for the recovery of interest or penalty for the assessment years 1982-83 to 1984-85 and pass such other order(s). IA NO: 4 OF 2007(WPMP 106708 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S RAVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VIJAY KUMAR PUNNA 2. . The Court made the following order: Though the matter is listed under the caption “for Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. In view of the same, this Court is constrained to dismiss the writ petition for non-prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date:27.06.2025 Ksj