Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32568 (PNJ)

BASANT v. PRIYA

FAO/3297/2022 · 2025-07-14

Anil Kshetarpal, To Be Nominated

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE 236 Basant Priya CORAM: Present : ANIL KSHETARPAL 1. allowed and the delay of 64 days in refilling the appeal is condoned. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR None for the appellant. **** ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. (Oral) On 26.07.2022, the following order was passed: “CM-8934-CII-2022 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 64 days in refilling the appeal is condoned. FAO-3297-2022 Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the evidence of the appellant was closed on the same day when divorce petition was dismissed. A perusal of the judgment dated 04.03.2022 shows that issues were framed on 02.05.2019 and since that date till the date of decision no evidence has been led by the appellant. The said judgment further shows that one complaint under the Domestic Violence Act and FIR No.25 dated 19.06.2018 are still pending. There is one male child from the marriage of the parties who is respondent-wife. An attempt can be made to secure the future of the child. HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH FAO-3297-2022(O&M) Date of Decision : July 14, 2025 .....Appellant VERSUS .....Respondent ANIL KSHETARPAL ROHIT KAPOOR On 26.07.2022, the following order was passed:- For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 64 days in refilling the appeal is condoned. arned counsel for the appellant submits that the evidence of the appellant was closed on the same day when divorce petition was dismissed. A perusal of the judgment dated 04.03.2022 shows that issues were framed on 02.05.2019 and ate of decision no evidence has been led by the appellant. The said judgment further shows that one complaint under the Domestic Violence Act and FIR No.25 dated 19.06.2018 are still pending. There is one male child from the marriage of the parties who is staying with the wife. An attempt can be made to secure the future of (O&M) , 2025 Appellant .....Respondent For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is arned counsel for the appellant submits that the evidence of the appellant was closed on the same day when divorce petition was dismissed. A perusal of the judgment dated 04.03.2022 shows that issues were framed on 02.05.2019 and ate of decision no evidence has been led by the appellant. The said judgment further shows that one complaint under the Domestic Violence Act and FIR No.25 dated 19.06.2018 are still pending. There is one male child staying with the wife. An attempt can be made to secure the future of PUNEET CHAWLA 2025.07.17 09:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2. respondent as litigation expenses in terms of order dated 26.07.2022 have not been deposited with the Registry of this Court. shall be done within four weeks from today. Pursuant thereof, notice be issued to the respondent for 24.05.2023.” 3. amount of litigation expense non-prosecution. 4. disposed of. July 14, 2025 PC -2- Notice of motion for 12.01.2023 subject to deposit of Rs.30,000/- as litigation expenses to the respondent by the applicant. LCR be summoned for the d On 12.01.2023, the following order was passed: “As per office report, notice could not be issued to the respondent as litigation expenses in terms of order dated 26.07.2022 have not been deposited with the Registry of this Court. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that needful shall be done within four weeks from today. Pursuant thereof, notice be issued to the respondent for 24.05.2023.” As per office report, the appellant has failed to deposit the amount of litigation expenses. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed for prosecution. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stand disposed of. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned. : Whether Reportable. : Notice of motion for 12.01.2023 subject to deposit as litigation expenses to the respondent by the LCR be summoned for the date fixed.” On 12.01.2023, the following order was passed:- As per office report, notice could not be issued to the respondent as litigation expenses in terms of order dated 26.07.2022 have not been deposited with the Registry of this Court. counsel for the appellant submits that needful shall be done within four weeks from today. Pursuant thereof, notice be issued to the respondent for 24.05.2023.” As per office report, the appellant has failed to deposit the s. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed for Pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stand (ANIL KSHETARPAL) JUDGE (ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Notice of motion for 12.01.2023 subject to deposit as litigation expenses to the respondent by the As per office report, notice could not be issued to the respondent as litigation expenses in terms of order dated 26.07.2022 counsel for the appellant submits that needful shall be done within four weeks from today. Pursuant thereof, notice As per office report, the appellant has failed to deposit the s. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed for Pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stand PUNEET CHAWLA 2025.07.17 09:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document