Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
249
CWP-7980-2022
Date of Decision: 14.05.2025
Pawan Kumar
…Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and another …Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present:- Mr. Vikas Lochab, Advocate, and Mr. Madhur Singh, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Harish Nain, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that matter has been rendered infructuous as the claimed benefits have already been granted to the petitioner vide office order dated 30.07.2024.
Disposed of as such.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE 14.05.2025 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PAYAL 2025.05.14 18:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment