( 2025:JHHC:37176 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 5721 of 2025 1. Raja Md. Rayaj, aged about 30 years, son of Nasim Mohammad @ Koka 2. Samsad @ Shamsad Alam, aged about 19 years, son of Basiruddin @ Suru 3. Md. Laden aged about 22 years, son of Julpukar Ali Md. 4. Islam @ Md. Israil, aged about 18 years, son of Md. Jainul 5. Sahid, son of Faru @ Md. Faruk, aged about 26 years, 6. Arsad @ Arsad Ali, son of Faru @ Md. Faruk, aged about 25 years 7. Alam Md. Parvej Alam, aged about 23 years, son of Naimul Islam Mastan Baba 8. Saddam Md. Saddam Hussain aged about 31 years, son of Md. Julpukar Ali 9. Suji Mumtaj Ansari aged about 32 years, son of Mufjul Rahman 10. Mamtaz @ Mumtaj Alam, son Sk. Salu aged about 28 years All residents of village Tentoposi, P.O. and P.S. Seraikella, District- Seraikella Kharsawan 11. Narsingh @ Sekh Samim, aged about 21 years, son of Faru@ Faruk, resident of village Duhajuri, P.O. and P.S. Sinpur, District- Jhalgram, West Bengal. 12. Adil @ Adil Hussain aged about 18 years, son of Koka @Inamul Hussain 13. Julpukar @Md. Julpukar Hussain, aged about 40 years, son of Md. Faruk Petitioner nos. 12 and 13 are residents of village Tentoposi, P.O. and P.s. Seraikella, District-Seraikella Kharsawan ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. J. N. Upadhyay, Advocate Ms. Harshikha Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P. 03/ 11.12.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Seraikella P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025, registered under sections 126(2)/115(2)/109/74/351(2) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023 of the I.P.C, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have received injury. ( 2025:JHHC:37176 ) He further submits that entire family members have been implicated in this case. He then submits that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 10 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations of assault and injury are there. 5. Considering that there is case and counter case between the parties, entire family members have been implicated in this case and petitioners have got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 10 of the petition, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella, in connection with Seraikella P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.11.12.2025 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-