RAVINDRA PAL ALIAS RAVINDRA PAL SINGH v. STATE OF U.P.
BAIL/39461/2025 · 2026-05-04
Jai Prakash Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3256 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3256 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 39461 of 2025 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No. 1094/2013 under Sections 420, 406, 409, 467, 471, 120-B IPC Police Station- Sadar Bazar, District - Shahjahanpur.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present crime. It is submitted that the allegations made against the applicant are false and fabricated. It is further submitted that co-accused- namely Jagdish Prasad, Pramod Kumar Gupta, Anil Kumar Gupta and Brijesh Kumar Gupta, have been granted bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 01.09.2020, 07.04.2021, 21.02.2023 and 27.09.2022 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.23928 of 2020, 11717 of 2021, 58767 of 2022 and 43567 of 2022. It is also submitted that there is no apprehension that after being released on bail, he may flee from the course of law or may, otherwise, misuse the liberty of bail and the applicant is in jail since 07.10.2025, and the possibility of conclusion of trial in near future is very bleak. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anuj Bajpai, Bal Ram Bind Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravindra Pal Alias Ravindra Pal Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
Learned A.G.A. has, however, opposed the prayer for grant of bail, but he has not disputed the above contention made by the
learned counsel for the accused-applicant that co-accused has already been released on bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, perusing the record and also considering the nature of allegations,
arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in mind that co-accused has already been released on bail by this Court and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail. Let applicant namely Ravindra Pal Alias Ravindra Pal Singh, be released on bail in the aforesaid Case Crime Number on his furnishing personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code. (iii) In case, the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fail to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the BAIL No. 39461 of 2025 2
trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. Any violation of above conditions will be treated misuse of bail and learned Court concerned will be at liberty to pass appropriate order in the matter regarding cancellation of bail. May 5, 2026 S.K.
BAIL No. 39461 of 2025 3 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad