APHC010481202022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 29250/2022 Between: 1. SHAIK GAFFAR SAB, S/O BADE SAB, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, 0CC. AGRICULTURE, RESIDENT OF D.NO.27/105, SIDDAREDDIGARIPALLI, H/O T.SUNDUPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT AT RAYACHOTY. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RAJARNPET, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, T.SUNDUPALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue Writ, or Direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4'h respondent in trying to dispossess the petitioner highhandedly from his 2 property admeasuring an extent of Ac.1.01 cents in Sy.No.1779, situated in T.Sundupalli village and Mandal, Annamayya District which is subject matter of D-Form Patta is illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and violation of Article 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4'h respondent not to dispossess the petitioner from the above mentioned property without following due process of law and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to dispossess the petitioner from the property admeasuring an extent of Ac.1.01 cents in Sy.No.1779, situated in T.Sundupalli village and Mandal, Annamayya District without following due process of law, pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Honourable court, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VUTUPALLI RAJANNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the 4th respondent in trying to dispossess the petitioner highhandedly from his property admeasuring an extent of Ac.1.01 cents in Sy.No.1779, situated in T.Sundupalli Village and Mandal, Annamayya District which is the subject matter of D-Form patta. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the instructions of the 4th respondent dated 19.08.2025 submits that the land to an extent of Ac.1.52 cents in Sy.No.1779 of T.Sundupalle Village is originally classified as “Dotted land” as per RSR of T.Sundupalli Village and Mandal. As per ROR-1 the land in Sy.No.1779 to an extent of Ac.1.52 cents is recorded in the name of Shaik Badesab vide 10(1) patta No.1449 and in the land owner column No.8 it was recorded in the name of Shaik Kareem Sab S/o Bade Sab to an extent of Ac.0.50 ½ cents and Shaik Gaffar Sab S/o Bade Sab to an extent of Ac.1.01 ½ cents of T.Sundupalli Village of T.Sundupalli Mandal. As per webland adangal for the fasili 1435 the land in Sy.No.1779 to an extent Ac.1.52 cents was recorded in the name of Shaik Kareem Sab S/o Bade Sab, to an extent of Ac.0.50 ½ cents vide Khata No.554 & Shaik Gaffar Sab S/o Bade Sab and to an extent of 4 Ac.1.01 ½ cents vide Khata No.555 of T.Sundupalli Village of T.Sundupalli Mandal. Since the Sy.No.1779 is a dotted land as per RSR, field enquiry has to be conducted by the field staff regarding the possession and enjoyment over the land. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to deal with the subject land in an extent of Ac.1.01 cents in Sy.No.1779, situated in T.Sundupalli Village and Mandal, Annamayya District strictly in accordance with law when it is required for any public purpose and if the petitioner is otherwise found to be in possession of the same, he shall be dealt with in accordance with law and any dispossession from the subject land shall not be made except by following the due process of law. The written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 19.08.2025 shall be made as part of the court bundle. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 17.09.2025 NNN