IRSHAD BANO AND ANOTHER v. UT OF J AND K TH SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/1151/2025 · 2025-05-07
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3255 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3255 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:- WP(C) No. 1151/2025 CM No. 2721/2025
Irshad Bano & Anr. …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Bari Abdullah, Advocate.
Vs
UT of J&K & Ors. .….Respondent(s) Through:
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (07.05.2025)
01. There is a mismatch between the name of petitioner No. 1 and her school record which is said to be proof of her age as in the school record it is “Arshad Bano”, where as in the petition it is “Irshad Bano”. Although, the name of the father is Sadeeq Ahmed in the petition as well as in the school record of the petitioner No. 1 but nevertheless there is a discrepancy which requires to be corrected by the petitioner No. 1 at her end in terms of her name mentioned in the writ petition.
02.
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file fresh one. Withdrawal is allowed.
03. The present writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty granted.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
07.05.2025
Bunty
Serial No. 107 Bunty Kumar 2025.05.08 09:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu