Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32548 (PNJ)

KANWALJIT v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/6816/2025 · 2025-03-25

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

112 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Kanwaljit State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Manoj Makkar TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The petition has been filed, directing the respondents Haryana Government Notification, dated 18.06.2014, Annexure P consequential benefits. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case he is permitte before the respondents raising the grievance as has been raised in this petition, and the same may be ordered to be decided within a specified period 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Rohit Arya, DAG, Haryana respondents-State the petitioner within two weeks respondent no.2 order thereupon receiving the representation. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6816 Date of Decision :25.03.2025 Versus of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Manoj Makkar, Advocate for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed, inter alia, directing the respondents to regularise the petitioner’s services in view of Haryana Government Notification, dated 18.06.2014, Annexure P consequential benefits. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case he is permitte before the respondents raising the grievance as has been raised in this petition, the same may be ordered to be decided within a specified period Notice of motion. Mr. Rohit Arya, DAG, Haryana State and submits that in case any such representation is filed by within two weeks from today, the same will be decided by 2/Director, Higher Education Department order thereupon in accordance with law, within receiving the representation. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 6816-2025 Date of Decision :25.03.2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Advocate for the petitioner. inter alia, seeking a writ of mandamus petitioner’s services in view of Haryana Government Notification, dated 18.06.2014, Annexure P-3, with all Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case he is permitted to make a fresh representation before the respondents raising the grievance as has been raised in this petition, the same may be ordered to be decided within a specified period Mr. Rohit Arya, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of and submits that in case any such representation is filed by , the same will be decided by Director, Higher Education Department, by passing a speaking in accordance with law, within a period of three months of mandamus petitioner’s services in view of with all Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the d to make a fresh representation before the respondents raising the grievance as has been raised in this petition, on behalf of and submits that in case any such representation is filed by , the same will be decided by by passing a speaking of PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.03.25 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-6816-2025 5. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6. Ordered accordingly. 7. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of March 25, 2025 ps 2025 -2- In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. March 25, 2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the 50,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.03.25 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document