DINESH S/O SHRI GYARSA RAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/17015/2024 · 2025-01-02
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Uma Shanker Vyas
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32546 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32546 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:76-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D. B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 17015/2024
1. Dinesh S/o Shri Gyarsa Ram, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Pali, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar.
2. Indra Devi W/o Shri Panchyaram, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Pali, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar.
3. Sheela Devi W/o Shri Bane Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Pali, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar. ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The District Collector, Alwar, District Alwar.
3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Ramgarh, District Alwar.
4. The Tehsildar, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar.
5. Buddhsingh S/o Shri Bhanwar Singh, R/o Pali, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar.
6. Bachan Singh S/o Shri Bhanwar Singh, R/o Pali, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Subhash Chand, Adv., on behalf of Mr. Suresh Kumar, Adv. For Respondents : Mr. G.S. Gill, Additional Advocate General with Ms. Shikha Sharma, Adv.
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 02/01/2025
1. This PIL seeks issuance of direction for removal of alleged illegal constructions made over Gair Mumkin Land.
2. Learned Additional Advocate General points out that the concerned Gram Panchayat which is otherwise competent to pass
[2025:RJ-JP:76-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-17015/2024] the order of eviction has not been impleaded as party in the petition.
3. Instead of allowing the petitioner to implead concerned Gram Panchayat as party in the petition, we are inclined to dispose off this petition at this stage with direction to petitioner to file afresh representation before the concerned Gram Panchayat.
4. If the proceedings have already been initiated, the concerned Gram Panchayat shall do well to expeditiously conclude the same.
5. However, in case the proceedings have been concluded one way or the other, we leave the petitioner to take such remedy against the order, if any passed by the concerned Gram Panchayat.
6. Petition is disposed off accordingly.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ MANOJ NARWANI-YOGESH /22