HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7900 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. This matter has been taken up on mentioning. 2. Heard Ms. Sheeba Rizvi, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri S.D. Shukla, learned AGA for the State respondents. 3. This application under Section 482 CrPC has been preferred for quashing the impugned charesheet dated 19.1.2012 and cognizance order dated 3.10.2012 as well as non-bailable warrant dated 29.1.2024 in Case Crime No. 1032 of 2011, under Sections 332, 353, 324, 506 IPC, P.S. Ajeem Nagar, District Rampur as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 614 of 2012 arising out of Case Crime No. 1032 of 2011. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants and the opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the same has already been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same is on the record. It is also submitted that in view of the compromise arrived at between the applicant and opposite party no. 2, proceedings of the aforesaid case be quashed against the applicant. 5. On the other hand, learned AGA for the State has no objection to the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant. 6. In view of the fact that the applicants and opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding verification of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Hari Shankar Tripathi, Sheeba Rizvi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ezaharulhasan And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) compromise is already on record and keeping in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed in respect of the applicants. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 7. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of impugned charesheet dated 19.1.2012 and cognizance order dated 3.10.2012 as well as non- bailable warrant dated 29.1.2024 in Case Crime No. 1032 of 2011, under Sections 332, 353, 324, 506 IPC, P.S. Ajeem Nagar, District Rampur as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 614 of 2012 arising out of Case Crime No. 1032 of 2011 are hereby quashed. 8. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands allowed. September 25, 2025 Abhishek A482 No. 7900 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad