[2025:RJ-JP:3911] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13708/2024 Krishna S/o Chajjuram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Khorlai Police Station Pratapgarh, District Alwar (Rajasthan). (Currently In The District Jail, Jaipur) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14717/2024 Guddu @ Ramkaran S/o Shri Arjunlal, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Dantli Bhatta Maid, P.S. Viratnagar, District Kotputli, Behror, Rajasthan. Presently Confined At Distt. Jail Jaipur. ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Madhumita Das, Adv., and Mr. Girraj Prasad, Adv., with Mr. Prateek Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP, Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/01/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.208/2024, registered at Police Station Raisar, District Jaipur Rural for the offence punishable under Section 310(2) of BNS, 2023. Later on, Police has filed charge- [2025:RJ-JP:3911] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13708/2024] sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Section 310(2) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submit that no specific role has been attributed to the petitioners. They further submit that it appears from the FIR that an exaggerated version has been narrated by the complainant. They argue that charge-sheet has already been filed, there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and trial of the case will take considerable time. They contend that the petitioners are in custody since 04.10.2024 and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially the fact that no specific role has been attributed to the petitioners; material available on record in the form of charge-sheet; absence of criminal antecedents and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1. Krishna S/o Chajjuram and 2. Guddu @ Ramkaran S/o Shri Arjunlal shall be released [2025:RJ-JP:3911] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13708/2024] on bail provided, each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/92-93