Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32535 (JHR)

SHASHI BHUSHAN SAH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/294/2024 · 2025-12-04

Rajesh Shankar

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:36384 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 294 of 2024 --- 1. Shashi Bhushan Sah, son of Chathu Mandal, resident of Raghunathpur, P.O. & P.S.- Raghunathpur, District- Godda 2. Dilip Kumar Jha, son of Shiv Shanker Jha, resident of Danrey, P.O. & P.S.- Poraiyahat, District- Godda 3. Dilip Kumar Kusbaha, son of Chandra Kishor Mahto, resident of Mohalitola, Nunbatta, P.O. & P.S.- Nunbatta, District- Godda … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Anjaneyulu Dodde, Deputy Commissioner, Dumka 3. Mrityunjay Kumar Baranwal, Deputy Commissioner, Pakur 4. Vishal Sagar, Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar 5. Hemant Sati, Deputy Commissioner, Sahebganj 6. Kumud Sahay, Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara 7. Zeeshan Qamer, Deputy Commissioner, Godda … … Opp. Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioners : Mrs. Sarita Gupta, Advocate Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Suraj Prakash, A.C. to S.C.-VII Order No. 10 Dated: 04.12.2025 The present contempt petition has been filed for initiation of contempt proceeding as against the opposite parties alleging willful violation of order dated 12.12.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 6394 of 2023. 2. Mr. Suraj Prakash, A.C. to S.C.-VII appearing on behalf of the opposite parties, submits that the cases of the petitioners for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher of respective districts have duly been considered and rejected except the petitioner no. 2 who has already been appointed. Thus, the aforesaid order of this Court has been complied. 3. Considering the said submission, there is no need to further proceed in the present contempt matter. 2 4. The contempt proceeding as against the opposite parties is hereby dropped. 5. The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. 6. The petitioners, except the petitioner no.2, are however at liberty to take appropriate recourses as permissible under law against the action of the concerned opposite parties in not appointing them on the post of Assistant Teacher. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) December 04, 2025 Ritesh/ Uploaded on 05.12.2025