VISHAL KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY
WPC/5627/2025 · 2025-10-29
Sri Ananda Sen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32533 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32533 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:32527 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 5627 of 2025 ------
1. Vishal Kumar, son of late Radha Prasad, resident of Agrawal Muhalla, P.O and P.S. and District- Lohardaga, Jharkhand.
2. Md. Enamul Ansari, son of Md. Ismail Ansari, resident of Bazar Tanr, P.O and P.S. Mandar, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand … Petitioner(s) Versus
1. State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, having its office at Ist Floor, Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi.
2. The Director, Department of School Education and Literacy, office at Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi.
3. The Principal Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasa Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, at Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi.
4. The Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, office at Kali Nagar, Chai Bagan, Namkum, Ranchi.
5. The Secretary, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, office at Kali Nagar, Chai Bagan, Namkum, Ranchi.
6. The Examination Controller, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, office at Kali Nagar, Chai Bagan, Namkum, Ranchi. … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the petitioner(s): M/s. Sameer Ranjan and Sameer Sahay, Advocates. For the State: Ms. Komal Tiwary, AC to AG For JSSC M/s Sanjoy Piprawall, Prince Kumar and Jay Prakash, Advocates. ------ 04/29.10.2025: Heard the parties.
2. The petitioners have challenged the notice dated 14.06.2025 and 12.6.2025 issued by the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission (JSSC) directing the petitioners to appear before them and produce evidence in support of their claim. It has been further mentioned in the notice that if the petitioners do not appear within particular time, as mentioned in the notice, appropriate order will be passed.
3. The petitioners claim that they have requisite qualifications which the JSSC doubts. Thus, notice has been issued to the petitioners.
4. At first, the petitioners should appear before the JSSC. This Court feels that this writ petition is premature. 5 Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed, as the same is premature. Anu/-Cp2. 29th October, 2025 (ANANDA SEN, J. )