Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32532 (RAJ)

BANWARI LAL SHARMA S/O SHRI MURLIDHAR SHARMA v. SH. ANAND KUMAR

CCP/1079/2024 · 2025-08-22

Ganesh Ram Meena

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:33374] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1079/2024 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.20690/2019 Banwari Lal Sharma S/o Shri Murlidhar Sharma, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Plot No. 88, Balaji Vihar-7, New Loha Mandi Road, Road No. 14, Vkia, Jaipur, M 9413417014. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Sh. Anand Kumar, Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Sh. Utkal Ranjan Sahoo, Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur. 3. Smt. Param Jyoti, Inspector General Of Police, Cid(Cb), Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. Sh. Prahlad Singh Krishnia, Superintendent Of Police, Cid(Cb) (Admn), Rajasthan, Jaipur. 5. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents/Contemnors For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushpendra Singh Tanwar with Mr. Rohit Tiwari for Mr. Shobit Tiwari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Samee Khan, AAAG, Ms. Almas Khanam for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 22/08/2025 1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order dated 13.10.2022 whereby, writ petition was disposed of in view of the judgment passed in [2025:RJ-JP:33374] (2 of 3) [CCP-1079/2024] the case of State of Rajasthan Vs. Krishna Kumar & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5926/2022 alongwith other connected matters) decided on 27.09.2022. 2. In the case of Krishna Kumar (supra), the Court had issued directions as under:- “(i) The Additional Chief Secretary (Home) is directed to constitute a High Level Committee of three members i.e. Secretary (Home),Secretary (DOP) & Additional Director General of Police(Recruitment). (ii) The Committee so constituted shall determine the year wise vacancies for promotion from the post of Constable to Head Constable and from Head Constable to ASI and shall complete the promotion process strictly in accordance with the Rules of 1989. (iii) In case of any difficulty in making the promotions the State Government is free to create superannuate posts in view of Rule 18 of RSR. (iv) The compliance be made within a period of six months.(v) The orders passed by the Tribunal impugned in the respective petitions stand modified accordingly in the above terms.” 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents-contemnors submits that the order of the Court has been complied with and the petitioner, namely, Banwari Lal Sharma has been allowed promotion from the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector to Sub- Inspector against the vacancy of year 2014-15. He has also placed before this Court a copy of the order dated 21.07.2025 issued by the Superintendent of Police (Administration & PRC), CID (CB), Rajasthan, Jaipur which is taken on record. [2025:RJ-JP:33374] (3 of 3) [CCP-1079/2024] 4. In view of the issuance of the order for promotion of the petitioner, this Court finds that the compliance of the order has been made. 5. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is dismissed. 6. Therefore, notice issued to the respondents shall stand discharged. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /219