Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23099 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1828 Year-2003 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran ====================================================== Sheikh Ghutan @ Noorul Hoda S/o S.K. Ahad R/o vill - Semara, P.S.- Turkauliya, Distt.- East Champaran, Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Isahak Ansari @ Ishaque Ansari S/o Late Md. Hussain Ansari R/o vill - Babhnawliya, P.S. - Turkauliya, Distt.- East Champaran, Motihari ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 01-05-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304, 201 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned A.P.P. at the outset submits that from perusal of the order impugned, it would manifest that already process under Sections 82 and 83 of the Cr.P.C. has been issued against the petitioner on 22.08.2023 and 16.10.2023 respectively and much thereafter the petitioner had moved before the learned District Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing A.B.P. No. 5703 of 2024 which was rejected by an order dated 13.01.2025.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23099 of 2025(2) dt.01-05-2025 2/2
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is not in a position to rebut the said submission of the learned A.P.P. for the State.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned A.P.P., the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner as process under Sections 82 and 83 of the Cr.P.C. was already issued in the year 2023 itself.
6. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Complaint Case No. C-1828 of 2003 pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari/Successor Court.
Kundan/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T