APHC010481752005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Thursday, Two Thousand and The Honourable Ms. Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal Between: Gugulothu Sankar D Koteswara Rao and Others Counsel for the appellant: 1. Ravi Kumar Tolety Counsels for the respondent 1. K S Murthy 2. Hari Babu Manne The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) the Twenty Seventh day of March Two Thousand and Twenty Five PRESENT The Honourable Ms. Justice B S Bhanumathi Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.1460 of 2005 ...Appellant AND D Koteswara Rao and Others ...Respondents ppellant: espondents: The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3311] 2005 Appellant Respondents 2 BSB, J M.A.C.M.A.No.1460 of 2005 JUDGMENT: This appeal is filed by the claimant against the order, dated 02.08.2004, passed in M.V.O.P.No.224 of 2001 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-III Additional District Judge, Vijayawada. Sri M. Vaibhav Raj, learned counsel representing Sri K.S.Murthy, learned senior counsel for the 1st respondent is present. Sri N.Rama Krishna, learned counsel representing Sri Hari Babu Manne, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent is present. No representation for the appellant. In view of the death of Sri Ravi Kumar Tolety, the learned counsel for the appellant reportedly expired, this Court directed issue of notice to the appellant. As such, notice through RPAD was sent by the Registry to the address of the appellant as given in the appeal and the claim petition. The notice was returned un-served with an endorsement ‘want of door number’ after trying to serve the notice on 13.11.2021, 15.11.2021 and 16.11.2021. Therefore, the service of notice is held sufficient. Since the appellant did not take steps to make appearance, the appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ B.S.BHANUMATHI, J 27-03-2025 RAR