Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32529 (KAR)

SRI. RAMACHANDRAIAH. H. R. v. SMT. VENI

RFA/1876/2022 · 2025-01-22

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2732 RFA No. 1876 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1876 OF 2022 (SP) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAMACHANDRAIAH. H. R. S/O. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, KSSIDC, RAJAJINAGAR INDUSTRIAL AREA, BENGALURU-560 044. 2. SMT. NETRAVATHAMMA W/O. LATE RAMACHANDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 970, 45TH CROSS, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 078. …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI.D., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SMT.VENI W/O. P.G.NARAYANSWAMY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.10, MARIYAMMA TEMPLE STREET, FIRST MAIN ROAD, VYALIKAVAL, BENGALURU-560 003. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE-560 001. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2732 RFA No. 1876 of 2022 3. SRI. NAGARAJA.A.C. S/O. LATE A.M.CHALUVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, 4. SMT. SOWBHAGYA W/O. NAGARAJA.A.C., AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, BOTH THE APPELLANTS RESIDING AT NO. 569, 69TH CROSS, 14TH MAIN ROAD, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, 1ST STAGE, BENGALURU-560 078. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellants are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 17.01.2025, on that day, when the matter is called, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the appellants it was ordered to be listed on 22.01.2025. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2732 RFA No. 1876 of 2022 The appeal is listed today for appearance of counsel of the appellants. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellants are not represented. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46