1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 207 of 2022 Date of Decision: 15.10.2025 Satish Kumar & others ....Petitioners Versus Rajnish & another ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For Respondents No. 1 & 2/State : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Additional Advocate General For Union of India Mr. Avinash Jaryal, Advocate. Vivek Singh Thakur,Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record copy of order dated 7.10.2025, passed by the Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 10021 of 2025, titled State of H.P. Vs. Satish Kumar and others, whereby it has been observed that during pendency of the appeal before the Apex Court, there is no justification for the High Court to proceed with the contempt proceedings for violation of the order under challenge and, therefore, contempt proceedings have been Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2( 2025:HHC:35070 ) directed to be kept in abeyance during the pendency of the appeal before the Apex Court. In view of the above, present matter is closed and disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to revive the present proceedings to its original number with original status as exists on the date by filing an appropriate application, if occasion arises to do so. Pending application(s) if any, shall also stands disposed of. (Vivek Singh Thakur) (Judge) (Romesh Verma) Judge 15th October, 2025(veena) 3( 2025:HHC:35070 )