APHC010480682006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE WRIT PETITION No: 26057 of 2006 Between: 1. P. Saddu, S/o.Appanna, Aged 46 years, Working As Panchayat Secretary, J.V. Agraharam, Beeminipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 1. The District Collector (PW), Visakhapatnam District At Visakhapatnam. 2. The District Panchayat Officer, Visakhapatnam District, At Visakhapatnam. 3. The Commissioner of Panchayat Raj, Andhra Pradesh, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad. 4. Glards, working as Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Mr.POODATTU AMARENDER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I 2. GP FOR SERVICES II 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION No: 26057 of 2006 P. Saddu, S/o.Appanna, Aged 46 years, Working As Panchayat Secretary, J.V. Agraharam, Beeminipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ...PETITIONER AND Collector (PW), Visakhapatnam District At Visakhapatnam. The District Panchayat Officer, Visakhapatnam District, The Commissioner of Panchayat Raj, Andhra Pradesh, Himayathnagar, Glards, working as Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.POODATTU AMARENDER Counsel for the Respondent(S): II IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3549] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA P. Saddu, S/o.Appanna, Aged 46 years, Working As Panchayat Secretary, J.V. Agraharam, Beeminipatnam Mandal, ...PETITIONER Collector (PW), Visakhapatnam District At Visakhapatnam. The District Panchayat Officer, Visakhapatnam District, The Commissioner of Panchayat Raj, Andhra Pradesh, Himayathnagar, Glards, working as Mandal Parishad Development Officer, ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 The Court made the following Order: (Per Hon’ble NJS, J) It is represented by Mr.S.Bhaskar, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter has become infructuous. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA _____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Date:11.08.2025 BLV 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Writ Petition No: 26057 of 2006 Dated: 11.08.2025 BLV