APHC010014432024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 867 of 2024 Between: 1. GURRAMKONDA RAJYA LAKSHMI,, W/O. K. RAMBABU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. H. NO. 2-3- 36JA, KV LAYOUT, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI URBAN MANDAL, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT. 2. CHIGURUPATI RAJENDRA NAIDU,, S/O. C. YARRAMANAIDU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCCT AGRICULTURE, R/O. CHERLOPALLI VILLAGE, PUDIPATLA POST, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT. 3. B. VENUGOPAL REDDY,, S/O. B. KONDREDDI, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. HOUSE NO. 36/127, SS COLONY, RAYACHOTI TOWN, YSR KADAPA DISTRTICT. 4. P. DAMU,, S/O. P. MUNIRATHNAM NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. DOOR NO. 1-97, CHERLOPALLI VILLAGE, PUDIPATLA POST, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT. 5. SMT. Y. LATHA,, W/O. Y. MUNIKRISHNA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. DOOR NO. 1- 183, CHERLOPALLI VILLAGE, PUDIPATLA POST, TIRUPATI RURAL BANDAL, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT. 6. SMT. S. USHA RANI,, W/O. P. MUNIRATHNAM, AGED ABOUT YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. H. NO. 6-8-1074, NGO COLONY, TIRUPATI TOWN, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT. 7. C.SRIDEVI, W/O. LATE C.SRINIVASULU NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/ O. CHERLOPALLI VILLAGE, PUDIPATLA MANDAL, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT. 8. B.RANI, W/O. LATE B.SUBBA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. 1-238 CHERLOPALLI 2 VILLAGE, PUDIPATLA MANDAL, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT. 9. V.SUBBALAKSHMI, W/O. V.CHANDRA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. 5-41, K.C.PALLI,PUTTAGARI VILLAGE, PENUMURU, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT, TIRUPATI, 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT. 5. THE TIRUPATI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in arbitrary taking possession of the petitioner's land admeasuring 234 Sq. Yards in Sy. No. 112B 85 108/6, an extent of 202 Sq. Yards in Sy. No. 128-2, an extent of Ac. 0.36 cents i.e., (Ac. 0.27 cents in Sy. No. 114/2 and an extent of Ac. 0.09 cents), an extent of 238.29 Sq. Yards in Sy. No. 128-2 and 128-3B, an extent of Ac. 204 Sq. Yards in Sy. No. 112/B, an extent of 78 Sq. Yards in Sy. No. 112/B, an extent of 446.05 cents in Sy. No. 128-2 and 128-3B and an extent of Ac. 0.50 cents i.e., (Ac. 0.12 cents in Sy. No. 114/3 and an extent of Ac. 0.13 cents in Sy. No. 114/4 and an extent of Ac. 0.25 cents in Sy. No. 114/5) situated at Cherlopalli and C.Mallavaram Villages of Tirupati rural Mandal, Tirupati (Chittoor) District for laying of road through the petitioner's land without considering the objections of the petitioners or without following the proceedings prescribed under Land Acquisition Act as illegal, arbitrary. Unconstitutional, against principles of natural justice and contrary to the 3 provisions laid down under Land Acquisition Act, 2013 and consequently direct the respondents not to lay the road through the petitioner's land as mentioned above without initiating proceedings for Land Acquisition Act or to pay compensation to the petitioner's land and pass orders. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G V GANGADHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP) 2. MUNI REDDY PERURU (SC FOR TUDA) The Court made the following: 4 ORDER: Sri Y.B.Ramesh, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioners on record, sought leave of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition and the same is also endorsed on the bundle. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 12.08.2025 siva 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.867 of 2024 Date: 12.08.2025 siva