Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:2472] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13728/2024 Kaushalya W/o Ramkhiladi, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Shivaji Nagar, Belaka, Police Station Vaishali Nagar, Alwar. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Babulal Bairwa For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Rajpal Yogi, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 17/01/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.126/2023 registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Alwar for the offences punishable under Sections 306, 506, 504 & 34 of IPC and Sections 3(1)(r) & 3(1)(s) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Charge-sheet has been filed for offences punishable under Sections 306, 506, 504 & 34 of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that petitioner is the mother-in-law of the deceased. It is submitted that matrimonial dispute was going on between daughter of the petitioner and deceased. Learned counsel contends that ingredients of Section 107 are not visible in the
[2025:RJ-JP:2472] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13728/2024] present matter. It is contended that petitioner is female and she is in custody since 18.10.2024. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. Charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take in its conclusion. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently oppose the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that petitioner is female; petitioner is in custody since 18.10.2024; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6.
This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Kaushalya W/o Ramkhiladi, shall be released on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that she shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /107