Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32506 (RAJ)

DR. SWATI MEHTA W/O SHRI AJAY CHHAJLANI v. S.S. JAIN SUBODH LAW COLLEGE

CW/17149/2022 · 2025-07-08

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:25137] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17149/2022 Dr. Swati Mehta W/o Shri Ajay Chhajlani, Aged About 48 Years, R/o S-4, Mahaveer Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur-302018. ----Petitioner Versus 1. S.s. Jain Subodh Law College, Sector 5, Shipra Path, Behind Metro Mass Hospital, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302020, Through Its Secretary. 2. Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar Law University, Rusa Bhawan, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur- 302015 Through Registrar. 3. S.s. Jain Subodh Siksha Samiti, Central Office Subodh College Campus, Rambagh Circle, Jaipur -04, Through Honble Secretary S.s. Bohra ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. TC Sharma for Mr. SS Hora For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tarun Verma for Mr. Anuroop Singhi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 08/07/2025 1. Instant writ petition was filed by petitioner on 15.11.2022 questioning the Advertisement dated 19.10.2022, for the post of Principal and praying to confirm the post of petitioner as Principal in S.S. Jain Subodh Law College. 2. Counsel for petitioner admits that during course of writ petition, he came to know that the petitioner was removed from the post of Principal vide order dated 17.11.2022 and charge has been handed over to one Smt. Anjali Bhatia. Counsel for petitioner [2025:RJ-JP:25137] (2 of 2) [CW-17149/2022] has moved application for amendment and for impleadment of S.S. Jain Subodh Shiksha Samiti as respondent No.3. No application for impleadment of Smt. Anjali Bhatia has been moved. 3. This Court finds that challenge to the removal of petitioner is a fresh cause of action. 4. In that view of the matter, counsel for petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant writ petition with liberty to file afresh in view of the subsequent development. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. 6. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J RONAK JAIMAN/75