2019:HHC:11569 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Civil Revision No. 116 of 2014 Decided on: 02.12.2025 ____________________________________________________ Thakur Sen Negi ……….. Petitioner Versus Sukh Lal Sharma ……….respondent ____________________________________________________ Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Karun Negi, Advocate. Petitioner Thakur Sen Negi present in person. For the respondent : Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate. ____________________________________________________ Bipin Chander Negi, Judge ( oral) On the last date, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/landlord had categorically made an offer to the tenant/petitioner that if in case he leaves the premises by 31.12.2025 in that eventuality, landlord/respondent would be ready and willing to forego use and occupation charges. 2. Today petitioner is present in person. Learned Sr. Counsel on instructions received from the petitioner submits that he is ready and willing to leave the premises by 31.12.2025. It is 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 made clear that if premises are not vacated by 31.12.2025, then the landlord shall be entitled for recovery of use and occupation charges along with up to date interest adjudicated in the case at hand. In view thereof, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge December 2nd, 2025 Susheel